It’s been interesting to watch the main topic of the past two Sunday magazine sections of the New York Times and the Boston Globe: blogging and monitoring our kids’ technology. These are both issues I think about a lot. In my students, I have for several years seen the evidence building that, as Sherry Turkle of MIT points out, our youth have a new interpretation of intimacy. I am paraphrasing her words in June 8th Globe article, but she points out that today’s youth do not associate privacy with intimacy: they create intimacy in public space through cellphone and internet use. My students –and many bloggers — have a tendency to overshare about intensely personal matters in their writing and then are utterly unprepared for what they have created. In many cases, what I would consider diary writing, or therapeutic writing, is exactly what is presented for public consumption. As evidenced the blogger whose life was essentially turned upside down as chronicled in last week’s Times, all this distance communication creates a false sense of security. Readers assume things about a writer, there is no way around that. And the more opaque you are, the more they assume they know you. And then when readers comment on that, the writer feels corned or defensive and blasts back a response . . . and all of a sudden you’ve got an addictive circle of commentary on commentary on commentary. It reminds me of grad school when the circle of commentary on literary critics’ commentary on great works of literature seemed endless and exasperating.
I am a great believer that good writing involves selecting one’s details carefully, but apparently that does not apply in the current blogosphere. What we used to share with our best friend huddled on the phone or behind the lockers, young people are publishing.
Is this good or bad, loss or gain? Or are those kinds of qualifiers useless now? I don’t know anymore, I feel like those 50’s parents that said Elvis was evil. But I do find myself asking: is it time for me and my methodology to move along?
